Canon EOS-1D MkIII - A Field report
There has been much debate over whether the 1DMkIII has autofocus problems or not, and I have to say that from my experience there is much learning that needs to take place before casting a vote in one direction or the other. Many things changed on the camera, and are quite different than how autofocus was setup on the 1DMkII, 1DsMkII, 1DMkIIn, 1D, and 1Ds. I found that the new 45-point autofocus mode is an improvement, but not enough to make me use it much of the time. I still use a single-point autofocus point most of the time, whether I am shooting a stationary subject or a moving/flying subject. I often am photographing large mammals with complex backgrounds, and the 45-point autofocus system is easily fooled in these scenarios. I typically select either the middle point or another point on the same horizontal plane, and go from there. If a subject is stationary, I might select any of the points available.
I found issues with the autofocus on the 1DMkIII, but given the same situations I found that my 1DMkII and 1DsMkII had similar problems with autofocus tracking. I had some missed shots early on, and I wasn't sure why. After changing most of the autofocus settings, I learned that out of the box the 1DMkIII isn't well suited for my style of photography. Not a problem, because I have now changed the camera to work for me. So after a few thousand photographs I think I can say that the 1DMkIII works great for me from an autofocusing standpoint. That doesn't mean that it doesn't have issues for other people. Since I don't typically photograph little brown birds that fly towards the camera, or athletes or motor cars, I can only state that the 1DMkIII works great for my specific situation. I am not interested in field testing the camera in other situations, because I don't have the time, inclination or desire to go beyond my own specific needs.
The battery performance of the new 1DMkIII is absolutely stellar. I have purchased a second battery, but I am willing to bet that I will rarely use it. With more than 2200 shots per fully charged battery, this is more than enough if you forget to charge at the end of a day. I use two, and sometimes three cameras on my safari shoots, which means 200-500 shots per day are distributed across the three cameras. So I could easily shoot for an entire week without charging back up. Very impressive!
The shooting speed is roughly 10 frames per second in high speed mode and 3 frames per second in low speed mode. I have configured the camera to shoot 5 frames per second in low speed, which is the mode I rely on most of the time. I only switch to high speed mode if I anticipate very fast movement or action.
Some small improvements have all added to up nice bonuses, such as the recessed dioptic adjustment at the eyepiece. No more accidental changes. There is a new joystick for navigating the menu system and autofocus system. There is a custom menu option for creating your own personal menu, which allows you to create a custom menu from any options within the setup of the camera, and place them all on an easy-to-reach custom menu. I am using this personal menu for the mirror lockup button, battery status, formatting, AF beep, etc. Very nice.
In the end the EOS 1DMkIII camera is a joy to use out in the field. I used the camera on a 100-400mm lens, and my 1DsMkII was mated with my 500mm lens. My longest lens usually gets the most work, so the new 1DMkIII only saw about 1/3 of my total shots. I still prefer to use the 1DsMkII for my primary camera, as I want the largest files possible for my stock and print sales business. I am willing to trade off frames per second and buffer size for the large file size of the 1DsMkII, and look forward to its replacement someday. I will then have a wonderful lineup of cameras, if it will be based on the 1DMkIII design. One can only assume, and hope.
Reader Comments (4)
I am more interested that the file sizes are not up to it really for wildlife. This is interesting. The AF issues will hopefully be resolved at some point.
Rob
I found your first part of the article was so true that not only the 1DMkIII's, but the existing 1DMkII's are having the same AF problems, and I believe so are the 1DsMkII's, not that i have one. For a long time, i thought the blurred ones were coming from me - user errors and not being Pro-enough that is. I am curious to know how you would deal with those big prints when the new 1DMkIII only give you 50% sharp pictures? and per Murphy's law often those are the ones that wildlife lovers clicked to buy from you. My MkIII came in for just a few weeks, and i am very curious to try that microfocus adjustment CF, have you done so and did it help? I try not to fill your blog so we will talk later! I am off to Asia again tomorrow night and i will check here from there. By the way, over the last year, i have refered quite a few individuals to your field trips, couple of them are actually very serious. And for me, one day Andy, i hope to join you out in the field.
Back to the brand new 1DsMkIII, I have been waiting for it as well, but was a little disappointed from reading the specs, that it seemed just like the 1DMkIII with a full size CMOS, and that's all. What do you think of it? and does it have that "same" AF chip in it?
Good day!Kevin Tatktat@san.rr.com
The 1DMk3 is a product that I keep scratching my head over. I do understand that there are autofocus issues, and that I may have some issues myself. However, I am not using the camera in a way that exposes these issues, or at least not very often. I won't recommend the 1DMk3 for any of my safari customers until I belive that there is a fix from Canon. I would love to pick up the 1DsMkIII, but I am going to wait a little bit until I know what I am getting for $8,000.